TacoBot Projections
Where TacoBot Was Right & Wrong — Week 6
How TacoBot's projections fared against actual results.
What changed from the prior period
D'Andre Swift made the largest rank gain, moving up 14 spots.
Javonte Williams had the largest rank drop, moving down 1 spots.
Where TacoBot Nailed It
- QB
Josh Allen
BUF · vs LV · PPR
- Projected FP
- 17.5
- TacoBot xFP
- 18.4
- Actual FP
- 18.3
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankQB1QB109 spots off · +0.8 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 8.0–27.5 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 17.2
- Top-5 chance
- 31%
- Actual opportunities
- 35
Josh Allen workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Pass attempts 30.6 33.0 Carries 4.5 5.0 The point estimate was close even though the rank was off.
-0.1 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
- QB
Brock Purdy
SF · vs WAS · PPR
- Projected FP
- 16.8
- TacoBot xFP
- 20.3
- Actual FP
- 17.4
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankQB2QB119 spots off · +0.5 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 0.0–28.1 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 17.4
- Top-5 chance
- 32%
- Actual opportunities
- 34
Brock Purdy workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Pass attempts 24.5 29.0 Carries 2.9 5.0 The point estimate was close even though the rank was off.
-2.9 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
- RB
Bijan Robinson
ATL · vs CHI · PPR
- Projected FP
- 17.4
- TacoBot xFP
- 7.3
- Actual FP
- 7.3
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankRB1RB3231 spots off · -10.1 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 7.1–29.3 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 16.1
- Top-5 chance
- 45%
- Actual opportunities
- 11
Bijan Robinson workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Carries 16.5 9.0 Targets 3.9 2.0 A surprising score, but still inside TacoBot's published P10–P90 range.
+0.0 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
Right Process, Wrong Result
- QB
Justin Herbert
LAC · vs KC · PPR
- Projected FP
- 16.1
- TacoBot xFP
- 16.9
- Actual FP
- 8.8
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankQB7QB2518 spots off · -7.3 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 7.4–25.3 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 15.7
- Top-5 chance
- 23%
- Actual opportunities
- 42
Justin Herbert workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Pass attempts 32.2 37.0 Carries 4.2 5.0 The opportunity forecast was close. Scoring landed in a less likely part of TacoBot's simulated range.
-8.2 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
- RB
Jawhar Jordan
HOU · vs JAX · PPR
- Projected FP
- 6.5
- TacoBot xFP
- 4.7
- Actual FP
- 12.0
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankRB30RB1911 spots off · +5.5 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 1.4–13.5 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 5.1
- Top-5 chance
- 4%
- Actual opportunities
- 7
Jawhar Jordan workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Carries 7.4 6.0 Targets 1.3 1.0 The opportunity forecast was close. Scoring landed in a less likely part of TacoBot's simulated range.
+7.3 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
- TE
Hunter Henry
NE · vs NYJ · PPR
- Projected FP
- 7.0
- TacoBot xFP
- 8.1
- Actual FP
- 14.8
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankTE8TE71 spot off · +7.8 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 0.0–15.1 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 5.5
- Top-5 chance
- 15%
- Actual opportunities
- 5
Hunter Henry workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Targets 3.9 5.0 The opportunity forecast was close. Scoring landed in a less likely part of TacoBot's simulated range.
+6.7 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
Where TacoBot Actually Missed
- WR
CeeDee Lamb
DAL · vs GB · PPR
- Projected FP
- 7.2
- TacoBot xFP
- 29.9
- Actual FP
- 16.0
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankWR31WR1813 spots off · +8.8 FP vs projectionMore DetailsInside 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 0.0–17.7 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 5.3
- Top-5 chance
- 9%
- Actual opportunities
- 18
CeeDee Lamb workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Carries 0.1 0.0 Targets 3.9 18.0 The targets forecast was 3.9 versus 18.0 actual.
-13.9 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
- WR
Matthew Golden
GB · vs DAL · PPR
- Projected FP
- 8.5
- TacoBot xFP
- 28.4
- Actual FP
- 22.4
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankWR14WR59 spots off · +13.9 FP vs projectionMore DetailsAbove 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 1.4–17.9 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 7.1
- Top-5 chance
- 9%
- Actual opportunities
- 13
Matthew Golden workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Carries 0.3 0.0 Targets 4.9 13.0 The targets forecast was 4.9 versus 13.0 actual.
-6.0 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
- WR
Emeka Egbuka
TB · vs PIT · PPR
- Projected FP
- 7.6
- TacoBot xFP
- 27.3
- Actual FP
- 17.8
TacoBot mean
Actual opportunities
Final score
RankWR24WR1212 spots off · +10.2 FP vs projectionMore DetailsAbove 80% range
Score comparison
Shaded band: TacoBot's 80% range, 1.4–15.5 FP (P10–P90). - Median FP
- 6.4
- Top-5 chance
- 6%
- Actual opportunities
- 16
Emeka Egbuka workload comparison Workload Projected Actual Carries 0.2 0.0 Targets 5.3 16.0 The targets forecast was 5.3 versus 16.0 actual.
-9.5 FP vs opportunity value (xFP)
Is TacoBot Getting Better?
Finalized PPR results only. Point and rank MAE are better when lower; Spearman and P10–P90 coverage are better when higher. A dash means that week has no published final grade.
| Metric | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point MAE | — | — | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
| Rank MAE | — | — | 33.2 | 33.2 | 34.6 | 31.8 | 33.2 |
| Spearman | — | — | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
| P10–P90 | — | — | 86% | 87% | 85% | 86% | 86% |
Season values pool all graded player weeks. P10–P90 is the share of actual scores inside the model's published 80% interval. MAE is the average miss in points or rank spots. Spearman shows how closely the predicted player order matched the real one (1 is perfect).
How this ranking works
How to read TacoBot Projections
- TacoBot simulates connected football games at least 10,000 times and summarizes each player's actual simulated outcomes.
- Fantasy scores are not assumed to follow a bell curve.
- Floor and ceiling are the 10th and 90th percentiles, not guaranteed low and high scores.
- Volatility is the standard deviation of those simulated fantasy points.
- Expected carries, targets and QB pass attempts show the workload behind a projection.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Source: TacoBot Monte Carlo · nflverse observed data.
View TacoBot Projections rankingsGet TacoBot in your inbox
Never miss new weekly rankings, fantasy football insights, or TacoBot research. Subscribe to get new articles delivered straight to your inbox.